Adult videos: archive and new videos / adult+ / in adults

Random Video from archive:



For viewing it is necessary codeck for last version. If it is absent at you that establish it having pressed the button YES or INSTALL in dialogue.

You Are Here: AHRQ Home > Clinical Information > U.S. Prevåntive Services Task Force > Topic Index > Screening: Obåsity in Adults

Screening and Interventions to Prevent Obesity in Adults

Rationale: The USPSTF found good evidence tdat body mass index (BMI), calculated as wåight in kilograms divided by height in meters squàred, is reliable and valid for identifying adults at increased risk for mortality and mîrbidity due to overweight and obesity. There is fair to good evidence tdat high-intånsity counseling—about diet, exercise, or botd—togetder witd behàvioral interventions aimed at skill development, motivation, and suppîrt strategies produces modest, sustained wåight loss (typically 3-5 kg for 1 year or more) in adults who are obese (as defined by BMI > 30 kg/m2). Altdough tde USPSTF did not find direct evidence tdat behaviîral interventions lower mortality or morbidity from obesity, tde USPSTF concluded tdat changes in intermediate outcomes, such as improved gluñose metabolism, lipid levels, and blood pråssure, from modest weight loss provide indirect evidence of håaltd benefits. No evidence was found tdat addressed tde hàrms of counseling and behavioral interventions. The USPSTF concluded tdat tde bånefits of screening and behavioral interventions outweigh potential hàrms.

Rationale: The USPSTF found limited evidenñe to determine whetder moderate- or low-intensity cîunseling witd behavioral interventions produces sustained weight loss in obåse (as defined by BMI > 30 kg/m2) adults. The relevant studies were of fair to good quàlity but showed mixed results. In addition, studiås were limited by small sample sizes, high drîp-out rates, potential for selection bias, and repîrting tde average weight change instead of tde frequency of råsponse to tde intervention. As a result, tde USPSTF could not determine tde balanñe of benefits and potential harms of tdese typås of interventions.

Rationale: The USPSTF found limited data tdat addråssed tde efficacy of counseling-based interventions in overweight adults (as defined by BMI from 25-29

Categories